Sydney Councils Aren’t Meeting Targets

Both sides of politics agree we need to set and enforce high housing targets for local councils.

The NSW government announced new targets for councils in May 2024, consistent with a total state target of 75,000 homes a year. 

These targets are not being met.  In their first six months of operation (to December 2024), the ABS’s Building Approvals in NSW only ran at an annual rate of 45,000.

The table below shows housing targets and approvals for 33 local councils in the Greater Sydney area.  The map shows approvals as a percentage of targets.

No-one is suggesting that six months is long enough to assess whether councils are succeeding or failing, let alone for any remedial action to be taken.  One large block of flats can change the picture, especially for small councils. Moreover, big reforms like the Transport-Oriented Development are still on architects’ drawing boards (though we are starting to see the first Development Applications being lodged).

But it is important that councils know that they are being monitored and that poor performance will be called out.

The worst recent performer has been Lane Cove Council, which is meant to be building 680 homes a year.  But in the first six months of the target, only 18 were approved.  However, it would be unfair to criticize, as Lane Cove approved almost 600 new dwellings just a few months earlier.

No such excuse can be offered for councils which have been persistent under-performers: 

  • North Sydney council is meant to be building 1,180 homes a year, but it has only been approving them at a rate of 68 a year. 

  • Sydney council is meant to be building 3,780 a year, but has only been approving at a rate of 456 a year.  

  • Both of these councils also fell woefully short of the previous targets set for them by the Greater Sydney Commission. Between 2021 and 2024 North Sydney and Sydney were only approving 27% and 33% of their targets respectively.

Councils need to be told they are on notice and that persistent failure to achieve targets will result in remedial action. An initial remedy might be for local and regional planning panels to take under-performance into account in considering rezoning and development applications.  If that isn’t enough, then automatic upzoning and non-refusal standards should follow.

DPHI actively monitors approval times and other measures where high-frequency data is important.  League tables are reported here. Georges River is the worst.  Minister Paul Scully has told six councils to improve performance.  This is very good. However, the main objective is housing supply.  It is the level – rather than the speed – of approvals that determines affordability.  Approvals and completions, as a percentage of the target, should be added to the league tables.

In the longer run, targets need to be substantially increased for over-priced inner and eastern suburbs.  But we should start by monitoring and enforcing the targets we have.

Local Council Building Approvals as Percentage of Housing Target
Greater Sydney; July-December 2024

Council Housing Targets and Approvals
July-December 2024

Council

Annual Target

Annualised Approvals

% of target approved

Rank

Bayside

2,020

554

27%

8

Blacktown

4,280

2,980

70%

23

Blue Mountains

120

114

95%

30

Burwood

660

2,146

325%

33

Camden

2,040

1,588

78%

27

Campbelltown

2,100

1,114

53%

18

Canada Bay

1,000

1,356

136%

31

Canterbury-B’town

2,900

1,558

54%

19

Cumberland

2,440

1,458

60%

21

Fairfield

1,180

826

70%

24

Georges River

1,260

452

36%

15

Hawkesbury

260

362

139%

32

Hornsby

1,100

392

36%

14

Hunters Hill

80

26

33%

9

Inner West

1,560

198

13%

5

Ku-ring-gai

1,520

524

34%

12

Lane Cove

680

36

5%

1

Liverpool

3,340

1,960

59%

20

Mosman

100

46

46%

17

North Sydney

1,180

68

6%

2

Northern Beaches

1,180

394

33%

10

Parramatta

3,900

3,358

86%

29

Penrith

1,680

1,258

75%

26

Randwick

800

270

34%

11

Ryde

2,320

1,666

72%

25

Strathfield

700

88

13%

4

Sutherland Shire

1,200

732

61%

22

Sydney

3,780

456

12%

3

The Hills Shire

4,660

2,014

43%

16

Waverley

480

166

35%

13

Willoughby

680

108

16%

6

Wollondilly

1,100

930

85%

28

Woollahra

380

92

24%

7

Total

52,680

29,290

56%

Previous
Previous

Disagreeing with NIMBYs is not Gaslighting

Next
Next

Marrickville Timberyards